Skip to main content

Table 6 Main opinions and suggestions of participants to their institutions and government bodies about IACUC and animal experiments

From: Improvement plans on the operation of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: focusing on the case of Seoul National University

To

Structured answers

CP

AD

FO

PI

PS

Institution

Providing education for reviewers and researchers including online classes

1

1

2

 

1

 

Reducing the number of protocols to review

3

    
 

Reduction of protocol submissions through integrated review of similar protocols

   

2

 
 

Additional staff and/or financial support

1

1

   
 

Improving the notice method to researchers

 

1

  

1

 

Strengthening post-approval monitoring activity

  

1

  
 

Integrated management of IRB, IBC and IACUC

1

1

4

2

1

 

Standardization of checking in and out of animals

  

1

1

 
 

Providing consulting and technical support by professionals such as attending veterinarians

   

2

1

 

Communication among IACUC, animal facility, and other related committees and institutions

   

1

1

Government

Legal guarantees of the independency and autonomy of the IACUC

2

1

   
 

IACUC regulatory amendments based upon the size of institution

1

    
 

Reinforcement of animal experiment alternatives through legal means

1

  

1

 
 

Minimum education requirement for reviewers and researchers

 

1

1

  
 

Mandatory hiring attending veterinarians

 

2

1

  
  1. Bold indicates the answers which were mostly and evenly distributed regardless of the respondents’ categories
  2. CP committee member; AD administrator; FO facility operator; PI principal investigator; PS postdoc/student