Fig. 2
From: Comparison of digital and traditional skin wound closure assessment methods in mice
Reporters’ analysis of wound closure rate by wound outline (WCR-O) (A, B) and re-epithelialisation (WCR-E) (C, D). FaD groups (wound n = 16, 15, 15 and 5 at Day 0, 4, 7 and 10 respectively) are shown in orange and Chow (wound n = 12, 12, 11 and 7 at Day 0, 4, 7 and 10 respectively) in green. Linear regression was performed for WCR-O (E) and WCR-E (F) measurements between Reporter 1 (x-axis) and Reporter 2 (y-axis) at Day 4 (E, F). Correlation coefficient (r) with t-test and goodness of fit (R2) are presented. Reporter 1 was unblinded, Reporter 2 blinded. Significance was indicated as follows: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****)