Fig. 3From: Comparison of digital and traditional skin wound closure assessment methods in miceLinear regression comparing wound closure measured by callipers and digital methods at Day 4. Wound closure rate by wound outline (WCR-O) (A, B) and re-epithelialisation (WCR-E) (C, D) measured by digital imaging (y-axis) vs callipers (x-axis) for Reporter 1 (A, C) and Reporter 2 (B, D). Correlation coefficient (r) with t-test and goodness of fit (R2) are presented. Reporter 1 was unblinded, Reporter 2 blinded. Significance was indicated as follows: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****)Back to article page