Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Laboratory Animal Research

Fig. 3

From: Comparison of digital and traditional skin wound closure assessment methods in mice

Fig. 3

Linear regression comparing wound closure measured by callipers and digital methods at Day 4. Wound closure rate by wound outline (WCR-O) (A, B) and re-epithelialisation (WCR-E) (C, D) measured by digital imaging (y-axis) vs callipers (x-axis) for Reporter 1 (A, C) and Reporter 2 (B, D). Correlation coefficient (r) with t-test and goodness of fit (R2) are presented. Reporter 1 was unblinded, Reporter 2 blinded. Significance was indicated as follows: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****)

Back to article page