Skip to main content

Comparison of humoral and cell-mediated immunity in three different C57BL/6N mouse substrains

Abstract

Adaptive immunity is a type of immune response mediated by T and B cells, and is important response for immune response amplification and memory. In this study, the adaptive immunologic properties of C57BL/6NKorl substrain were compared with those of two other C57BL/6N substrains. There were no significant differences between the C57BL/6NKorl and the two other C57BL/6N substrains in the histological structures of the thymus and spleen, which are immunologic organs containing T cell and B cells. In addition, flow cytometric analysis did not reveal any significant differences in the distribution of T and B cell populations of the three substrains. To evaluate cell-mediated immunity of T cells in the three different substrains, we treated isolated T cells from spleen with Con A. The T cells of C57BL/ 6NKorl showed Con A-dependent proliferation of T cells at lower cell number than those in T cells from the other two C57BL/6N substrains. B cell-mediated humoral immune responses were not significant different among the three substrains. Thus, the results of this study provide evidence that C57BL/6NKorl mice are similar to those two other C57BL/6N substrains in humoral immunity, but C57BL/6NKorl has stronger response in cell mediated immunity.

References

  1. 1.

    Wade CM, Daly MJ. Genetic variation in laboratory mice. Nat Genet 2005; 37(11): 1175–1180.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barros SF, Friedlanskaia I. Petricevich VL, Kipnis TL. Local inflammation, lethality and cytokine release in mice injected with Bothrops atrox venom. Mediators Inflamm 1998; 7(5): 339–346.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Crawley JN, Belknap JK, Collins A. Crabbe JC, Frankel W. Henderson N. Hitzemann RJ, Maxson SC, Miner LL, Silva AJ, Wehner JM, Wynshaw-Boris A. Paylor R. Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997; 132(2): 107–124.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Harris RB, Mitchell TO, Yan X. Simpson JS, Redmann SM Jr. Metabolic responses to leptin in obese db/db mice are strain dependent. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2001; 281(1): R115–132.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kile BT, Mason-Garrison CL, Justice MJ. Sex and strain-related differences in the peripheral blood cell values of inbred mouse strains. Mamm Genome 2003; 14(1): 81–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Madiehe AM, Hebert S. Mitchell TO, Harris RB. Strain-dependent stimulation of growth in leptin-treated obese db/db mice. Endocrinology 2002; 143(10): 3875–3883.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nishina PM, Wang J. Toyofuku W. Kuypers FA, Ishida BY, Paigen B. Atherosclerosis and plasma and liver lipids in nine inbred strains of mice. Lipids 1993; 28(7): 599–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Opsahl ML, McClenaghan M. Springbett A. Reid S. Lathe R. Colman A. Whitelaw CB. Multiple effects of genetic background on variegated transgene expression in mice. Genetics 2002; 160(3): 1107–1112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rossmeisl M. Rim JS, Koza RA, Kozak LP. Variation in type 2 diabetes-related traits in mouse strains susceptible to diet-induced obesity. Diabetes 2003; 52(8): 1958–1966.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sellers RS, Clifford CB, Treuting PM, Brayton C. Immunological variation between inbred laboratory mouse strains: points to consider in phenotyping genetically immunomodified mice. Vet Pathol 2012; 49(1): 32–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    van Bogaert MJ, Groenink L. Oosting RS, Westphal KG, van der Gugten J. Olivier B. Mouse strain differences in autonomic responses to stress. Genes Brain Behav 2006; 5(2): 139–149.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Woodworth CD, Michael E. Smith L. Vijayachandra K. Glick A. Hennings H. Yuspa SH. Strain-dependent differences in malignant conversion of mouse skin tumors is an inherent property of the epidermal keratinocyte. Carcinogenesis 2004; 25(9): 1771–1778.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dux A. Muhlbock O. Bailey DW. Genetic analyses of differences in incidence of mammary tumors and reticulum cell neoplasms with the use of recombinant inbred lines of mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978; 61(4): 1125–1129.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Festing MF. Properties of inbred strains and outbred stocks, with special reference to toxicity testing. J Toxicol Environ Health 1979; 5(1): 53–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zurita E. Chagoyen M. Cantero M. Alonso R. Gonzalez-Neira A. Lopez-Jimenez A. Lopez-Moreno JA, Landel CP, Benitez J. Pazos F. Montoliu L. Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains. Transgenic Res 2011; 20(3): 481–489.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Talmadge JE, Meyers KM, Prieur DJ, Starkey JR. Role of natural killer cells in tumor growth and metastasis: C57BL/6 normal and beige mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980, 65(5): 929–935.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Boehm T Design principles of adaptive immune systems. Nat Rev Immunol 2011; 11(5): 307–317.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen J. Flurkey K. Harrison DE. A reduced peripheral blood CD4(+) lymphocyte proportion is a consistent ageing phenotype. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123(2–3): 145–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chen J. Harrison DE. Quantitative trait loci regulating relative lymphocyte proportions in mouse peripheral blood. Blood 2002; 99(2): 561–566.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Glineur S. Antoine- Moussiaux N. Michaux C. Desmecht D. Immune depression of the SJL/J mouse, a radioresistant and immunologically atypical inbred strain. Immunobiology 2011; 216(1–2): 213–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mayer A. Lilly F. Duran-Reynals ML. Genetically dominant resistance in mice to 3-methylcholanthrene-induced lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1980; 77(5): 2960–2963.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McVicar DW, Winkler-Pickett R. Taylor LS, Makrigiannis A. Bennett M. Anderson SK, Ortaldo JR. Aberrant DAP 12 signaling in the 129 strain of mice: implications for the analysis of gene-targeted mice. J Immunol 2002; 169(4): 1721–1728.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mills CD, Kincaid K. Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol 2000; 164(12): 6166–6173.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Green MC, Grueneberg H. Hertwig P. Heston WE, Lyon MF, Medvedev NN, Snell GD, Staats J. A revision of the standardized genetic nomenclature for mice. J Hered 1963; 54: 159–162.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Eppig JT, Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE; Mouse Genome Database Group. The mouse genome database (MGD): new features facilitating a model system. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(Database issue): D630–637.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Silver LM. Mouse genetics: concepts and applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995; pp 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant of BIOREIN (Laboratory Animal Bio Resources Initiative) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2016.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae Youn Hwang.

Rights and permissions

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.R., Choi, J.Y., Kim, K.S. et al. Comparison of humoral and cell-mediated immunity in three different C57BL/6N mouse substrains. Lab Anim Res 33, 132–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5625/lar.2017.33.2.132

Download citation

Keywords

  • C57BL/6N
  • C57BL/6NKorl
  • T cell
  • B cell
  • cell-mediated immunity
  • humoral immunity