Skip to main content

Induction of liver transplant immune tolerance in an outbred rat strain model using tacrolimus

Abstract

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation is the only option for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy is important to prevent graft failure. We investigated the effectiveness of tacrolimus (FK506) and their mechanisms for liver transplant immune tolerance in an outbred rat LT model.

Results

To investigate the therapeutic effect of the FK506 on outbred rat LT model, FK506 and postoperative therapy were administered subcutaneously once or twice daily to transplanted rats. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for all groups. The regulation of inflammatory cytokine signaling in the spleen was analyzed by flow cytometry. FK506 attenuated allograft rejection and increased survival in rat orthotopic liver transplantation models. The FK506-treated group had reduced serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase. Furthermore, FK506 decreased the expression of inflammatory cytokines and the activation of pathogenic Th1 and Th17 cells in the liver.

Conclusions

Taken together, we revealed that FK506 ameliorated strong allograft rejection in outbred liver transplantation model by anti-inflammatory effect and inhibitory peroperty of pathogenic T cells.

Background

As the number of patients with liver disease increases, the frequency of liver transplantation (LT), which is the final treatment method, is increasing. LT is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure, based on overall survival and quality of life [1, 2]. The success of LT and long-term survival depend on the use of immunosuppressant drugs. However, the long-term (lifetime) use of immunosuppressive drugs after transplantation has serious side effects, such as cancer, infection, inflammation, and destruction of the immune-defense system [3, 4]. Thus, a major goal in transplantation is to induce immunological self-tolerance and homeostasis.

LT is a complex procedure that involves the safe extraction and preparation of the donor liver, removal of the recipient's diseased liver, and then anastomosis of the blood vessels and biliary tract [5, 6]. In rats, the most common technique is orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), in which the native liver is removed and replaced by the donor organ in the same anatomic position [7, 8]. However, rat transplantation surgery requires a long training period to achieve a high success rate using the fast, accurate, and delicate surgical procedures required for small animals. The rat OLT model produces more clinically relevant and reliable data than does the mouse OLT model [6].

In animal LT, liver allografts are commonly accepted across fully mismatched major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) without immunosuppression [9]. In inbred mice, liver grafts in many fully allogeneic combinations survive permanently without the administration of immunosuppressants [10]. Inbreeding depression and the lack of genetic diversity in inbred mice, however, could mask unappreciated causes of graft failure or remove barriers to tolerance induction. Human genes are not identical. In this study, we used outbred rats with genetic diversity in donors and the recipients to mimic the clinical situation.

Tacrolimus (FK506) has become the first-line immunosuppressant drug used after LT [11,12,13]. We determined the therapeutic efficacy of FK506 in an outbred rat LT model. This model, which features a strong immune response, contributed to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the induction of liver transplant immune tolerance by FK506. The aim of this study was to determine whether FK506 could mitigate allograft rejection and to clarify their mechanisms underlying the induction of liver transplant immune tolerance in an outbred rat LT model.

Results

Post-transplantation FK506 treatment improved graft failure in an outbred liver transplantation model

In previous studies, OLT was performed using inbred rats; in this study, it was performed in outbred rats who were treated with FK506 to increase survival and reduce organ rejection (Fig. 1A, B). Drug therapy was administered before and after surgery to increase the operation success rate. The treatment given to liver-transplant recipient rats included antibiotics, painkillers, and FK506 (Table 1). Metabolic index assays were conducted to measure liver function. The FK506-treated group showed reduced serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and triglyceride (TG) compared to rejection group. Moreover, the FK506-treated recipient rats showed reduced levels of LDL cholesterol and FFAs, and increased levels of HDL cholesterol (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Tacrolimus attenuates liver allograft rejection in rats. A Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed in SD and Wistar rats. Postoperative therapy was administered daily until sacrifice. B Survival rates in recipients (control and 1 mg/kg FK506–treated groups). C Changes in serum levels of AST, ALT, ALP, TG, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and FFAs in all groups at day 3 after LT. The data are reported as the means ± SDs from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05

Table 1 Pre-and post- management for liver transplantation

FK506 attenuates pro-inflammatory response and fibrosis in an outbred LT model

Fibrosis and infiltration of inflammatory cells were analyzed through hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome (MT), and Sirius red staining. Liver tissue from the rejection groups showed significantly severe liver damage with infiltration of inflammatory cells, collagen deposition, and hepatic fibrosis. The infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis were reduced in liver tissue from the FK506-treated groups compared to rejection group (Fig. 2). Additionally, we used immunohistochemistry to detect inflammatory mediators and fibrosis markers in the transplanted livers. Administration of FK506 decreased the expression of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) in liver tissues (Fig. 3). Also, the expression of fibrosis markers which were α-sma and Collagen I alpha 1(Col-1) were less infiltration in liver tissues from FK506 treated group compared to those from rejection group. Thus, FK506 ameliorated allograft rejection by downregulating the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic factors.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tacrolimus alleviates liver graft injury and fibrosis. Morphological changes in grafts after LT. Liver tissues were acquired from the control and FK506 (1 mg/kg) groups at day 3 after LT and analyzed by staining with H&E, MT, and Sirius red to evaluate the severity of inflammation and fibrosis. The data are reported as means ± SDs from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Fig. 3
figure 3

Tacrolimus decreases the expression of hepatic proinflammatory cytokines. The expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TGF-β, IL-17, Type I collagen and α-SMA in the transplanted livers was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Positive cells for each antibody are shown on the right. The data are reported as means ± SDs from three independent experiments. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001

Tacrolimus suppressed in vivo effector T-cell responses in an outbred LT model

To investigate the in vivo mechanism underlying the action of FK506 in the outbred LT model, we counted the number of CD4+ interferon (IFN)-γ+, CD4+IL-17+, and CD4+IL-10+cells in splenocytes isolated from each group using flow cytometry. The numbers of CD4+IFN-γ+ and CD4+IL-17+ T cells in spleens from FK506-treated LT model rats were decreased compared with those in the rejection group. The numbers of CD4+IL-10+cells in the splenocytes were also reduced in the FK506-treated LT model compared with those in the rejection group (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, confocal microscopic analysis showed decreases in the numbers of CD4 + IFN-γ + and CD4 + IL-17 + T cells in the spleens of FK506-treated rats (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that the alleviation of acute allograft rejection following transplantation with FK506-treated splenocytes is the result of the suppression of the pathogenic T-cell response.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Tacrolimus inhibits Th1 and Th17 cell activation. A The expression of IFN-g, IL-17, and IL-10 in the spleen from all groups at day 3 after LT was assessed by flow cytometry with gating on CD4+IFN-γ+, CD4+IL-17+, or CD4+IL-10+ cells. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. B Spleens were examined by immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies against CD4 (green) and IL-17 (red). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Original magnification, × 400

Discussion

In the inbred LT model, liver allografts can be accepted across mismatched MHCs without immunosuppressive drug therapy [14]. Unlike in the outbred system, the rate of successful transplant engraftment is high in inbred mouse models. However, human systems are very different from inbred mouse systems. The human outbred population contains an excess of heterozygotes. The genetic diversity and heterosis in the outbred human population have been suggested to make successful organ transplantation very difficult [15, 16]. To establish the outbred rat LT model in this study, we used outbred Wistar and SD rats, which are typically used in transplantation and functional tests. We created a strong rejection model using outbred rats to approximate the clinical situation. This model will deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying LT tolerance.

Immunosuppressive drugs are commonly used following LT [11]. Calcineurin inhibitors, including FK506, serve to prevent transcription of the autocrine factor IL-2, preventing cell proliferation [17]. FK506 greatly reduced the rate of allograft rejection, although the chronic use of such drugs is marred by a range of side effects, including vascular toxicity [13]. We found that FK506 treatment significantly prolonged graft survival and reduced hepatic inflammation. In addition, FK506 suppressed pro-inflammatory T helper (Th)1/Th17 responses [18, 19] and Foxp3 + Treg [20]. However, FK506 also inhibits immunomodulatory IL-10 cytokines [21]. In a mouse transplantation model, the genetic delivery of IL-10 to allografts led to prolonged graft survival [22, 23]. Novel immunomodulatory regimens that maximize beneficial effects for transplantation tolerance without the aforementioned adverse effects are needed. Further research is needed to determine the minimum effective FK506 dosage when used in combination with immunoregulatory drugs.

Blood chemistry tests showed that liver function was improved [24]. The levels of enzyme-related liver metabolites (ALT, AST, and ALP) were significantly reduced in the group treated with FK506 compared with the rejection group. The ALT and ALP levels were restored to similar levels as in the wild-type (WT) group.

Interestingly, FK506 treatment also had significant effects on lipid metabolism. The TG level was lower than in the rejection group and similar to that in the WT group. The total cholesterol level was slightly higher than in the rejection group, but the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and free fatty acid (FFA) were low; the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level was higher and close to that in the WT group. Considering that fatty liver disease is a common factor for LT and is likely to recur after transplantation, FK506 represents a new alternative post-LT treatment for patients with fatty liver disease.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that an outbred hepatic transplantation model led to robust immune rejection and that FK506 induced long-term allograft acceptance.

Methods

Animals

Six-week-old male Wistar and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (male, 180–220 g at baseline) were purchased from Japan SLC Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan) by Central Lab Animal Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). A maximum of three animals per cage were housed in a room with controlled temperature (20–26 °C) and light (12/12-h light/dark cycle) conditions. The rats had free access to a gamma ray–sterilized diet (TD 2018S; Harlan Laboratories Inc., IN, USA) and autoclaved R/O water. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Catholic University of Korea (approval no. CUMS-IACUC-2017-0215-03). All procedures performed followed the ethical guidelines on animal use.

Orthotopic liver transplantation

The animals were divided into three groups: a non-surgical control group and surgical groups with and without FK506 treatment (n = 5/group). LT recipients were premedicated with atropine sulfate [0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC) injection; JE IL Pharm. Co., Ltd., Korea], heparinized saline (100 ml/kg, intravenous injection; heparin 5000 IU/ml, JW Pharm. Co., Korea; 0.9% normal saline, Dai Han Pharm. Co. Ltd., Korea), ketoprofen (5 mg/kg, SC, 100-mg ketoprofen injection; SDC Pharm. Co., Korea), tramadol (5 mg/kg, SC, 50-mg tridol injection; YUHAN Co., Korea), and cefazolin (30 mg/kg, SC, 1-mg cefazolin injection; Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corp., Korea). Following surgery, normal saline (Dai Han Pharm. Co. Ltd.) or 5% dextrose saline (5% dextrose and sodium chloride injection, Dai Han Pharm. Co. Ltd.) was administered subcutaneously. Dexamethasone (5-mg/kg cortisol injection, SC; HanAll Biopharma, Seoul, S. Korea) was administered once during surgery, at the moment of reperfusion. Anesthesia was carried out using an anesthetic machine (Harvard, USA) and isoflurane (2–3.5%, ifran; Hana Pharm. Co. Ltd., Seoul, S. Korea) during the LT operation. All procedures performed in this study were OLTs based on a modified version of Kamada’s technique under a × 5-magnified surgical field using a surgical loupe [5, 8, 25]. The donor rat was placed in the supine position. Long midline and additional right transverse incisions were made to ensure adequate exposure. After inspection for the presence of perihepatic anomaly, the phrenic vein was ligated and divided using 7–0 silk sutures. All suspensory ligaments surrounding the liver were divided. The bile duct was dissected and transected in the supraduodenal area with enough length remaining after cuff insertion (24-gauge angiocatheter; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). The retroperitoneal connective tissues were dissected, the right adrenal vein was ligated, and the infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) was freed. The portal vein was prepared for perfusion, and the pyloric vein was ligated and divided to enable portal vein cuff manipulation. Simultaneous cross-clamping of the infrahepatic IVC and the portal vein was performed. The graft was perfused through the portal vein with minimal pressure using ~ 10 ml cold heparinized saline, and venting was performed through the right atrium using a transdiaphragmatic approach. The liver graft was retrieved from the cold-preservation saline solution, and bench surgery was performed in preserved saline solution. The attached diaphragmatic tissue was dissected, and the portal vein cuff (polyethylene tube, 6 FG, outside diameter 2.1 mm; Havard Apparatus, USA) was inserted. The total preservation time, including the bench procedure, was approximately 90 min. Immediately following the donor operation, a total hepatectomy was performed in the recipient in almost the same manner as the donor surgery. The main difference was that the transections were made close to the liver to secure sufficient lengths of the bile duct, portal vein, and IVC to perform the reconstruction. Following total hepatectomy, the preserved graft liver was implanted. The suprahepatic IVC was reconstructed using 8–0 monofilament nylon continuous sutures. The infrahepatic IVC was reconstructed in the same end-to-end manner using 8–0 monofilament nylon continuous sutures. Following portal vein reconstruction, the suprahepatic, infrahepatic, and portal cross-clamps were released to restore the systemic and hepatic circulation. At this point, 2 ml saline and dexamethasone were injected subcutaneously. The total vascular clamping time was 20–25 min. Following bile duct reconstruction using the cuff technique, the abdominal wound was closed using 5–0 monofilament nylon sutures. All surgical procedures were performed under aseptic conditions. After surgery, the recipients were observed closely in warmed cages for ~ 1 h.

Postoperative medications were administered and included analgesics (ketoprofen, 5 mg/kg, SC, twice a day; tramadol, 5 mg/kg, SC, once a day), antibiotics (cefazoline, 30 mg/kg, SC, once a day), a histamine H2 receptor blocker (ranitidine HCl, 5 mg/kg, twice a day; Alcon, Korea), and FK506 (1 mg/kg, SC, twice a day). For the fluid therapy, normal saline or 5% dextrose saline was given, depending on the recipient’s condition. To help feed the animal, the animals were supplied a gel-type recovery diet (Nutra-Gel, F5769-Kit; Bio Serv, USA).

Clinical evaluation and examination after orthotopic liver transplantations

Animals were randomly assigned to different experiments to evaluate the in vivo effects of FK506 on survival, serum parameter and histological analysis and T cell subset analysis. All animals of each groups (n = 3) were monitored until death to determine survival time.

Biochemical analysis

ALT, AST, ALP, TG, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and FFA levels were measured using commercial kits (Asan Pharmaceutical Co., Hwangseong-gi, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea).

Histopathological analysis

All liver tissues were collected from each group. The tissues were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4–5 μm thickness were cut, dewaxed using xylene, dehydrated through an alcohol gradient, and then stained with H&E and MT.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded sections were incubated at 4℃ with the following primary monoclonal antibodies: anti–IL-1β, anti–IL-17, anti–IL-6, and anti–TGF-β. The samples were then incubated with the respective secondary biotinylated antibodies, followed by 30 min incubation with a streptavidin–peroxidase complex. The reaction product was developed using 3,3-diaminobenzidine chromogen (Dako, CA, USA).

Flow cytometric analysis

Mouse lymphocytes were immunostained using fluorescently conjugated antibodies against CD4, IL-17, IL-10, and IL-4. For intracellular staining, cells were first stimulated for 4 h with phorbol myristate acetate (25 ng/mL) and ionomycin (250 ng/mL) in the presence of BD GolgiStop (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Intracellular staining was performed using a BD Cytofix/CytopermPlus Fixation/Permeabilization Kit and BD GolgiStop Kit (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry was performed using a cytoFLEX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

Confocal staining

Spleen tissues were acquired from the liver-transplanted rats, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80℃. Tissue cryosections (7 μm thick) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained using FITC-conjugated anti-CD4, and PE-conjugated anti–IL-17 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). After incubation overnight at 4℃, the stained sections were analyzed using a confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta; Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). CD4 + IL-17 + T cells were enumerated visually at higher magnification (projected on a screen) by four individuals.

Statistical analyses

Data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the mean. One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used to compare data among three or more groups. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism (standard version 8; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Availability of data and materials

All data are available in the manuscript or upon request to the authors.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

MHCs:

Major histocompatibility complexes

MT:

Masson’s trichrome

OLT:

Orthotopic liver transplantation

References

  1. Merion RM. Current status and future of liver transplantation. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(4):411–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodzin AS, Baker TB. Liver transplantation today: where we are now and where we are going. Liver Transpl. 2018;24(10):1470–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiang KC, Ohmori N, Goto T. The search for immunosuppressive therapies to induce tolerance in organ transplantation. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2011;11(2):173–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kourkoumpetis T, Levitsky J. Immunosuppressive drug levels in liver transplant recipients: impact in decision making. Semin Liver Dis. 2019;39(4):414–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee S, Charters AC, Chandler JG, Orloff MJ. A technique for orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat. Transplantation. 1973;16(6):664–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hori T, Nguyen JH, Zhao X, Ogura Y, Hata T, Yagi S, et al. Comprehensive and innovative techniques for liver transplantation in rats: a surgical guide. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(25):3120–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Spiegel HU, Palmes D. Surgical techniques of orthotopic rat liver transplantation. J Invest Surg. 1998;11(2):83–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagai K, Yagi S, Uemoto S, Tolba RH. Surgical procedures for a rat model of partial orthotopic liver transplantation with hepatic arterial reconstruction. J Vis Exp. 2013;73: e4376.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Madariaga ML, Kreisel D, Madsen JC. Organ-specific differences in achieving tolerance. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2015;20(4):392–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qian S, Demetris AJ, Murase N, Rao AS, Fung JJ, Starzl TE. Murine liver allograft transplantation: tolerance and donor cell chimerism. Hepatology. 1994;19(4):916–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moini M, Schilsky ML, Tichy EM. Review on immunosuppression in liver transplantation. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(10):1355–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhanasekaran R. Management of immunosuppression in liver transplantation. Clin Liver Dis. 2017;21(2):337–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schutte-Nutgen K, Tholking G, Suwelack B, Reuter S. Tacrolimus—pharmacokinetic considerations for clinicians. Curr Drug Metab. 2018;19(4):342–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Limmer J, Herbertson BM, Calne RY. Orthotopic rat liver transplantation using different combinations of four inbred strains. Eur Surg Res. 1980;12(5):343–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reichenbach DK, Li Q, Hoffman RA, Williams AL, Shlomchik WD, Rothstein DM, et al. Allograft outcomes in outbred mice. Am J Transpl. 2013;13(3):580–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brekke TD, Steele KA, Mulley JF. Inbred or outbred? Genetic diversity in laboratory rodent colonies. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(2):679–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beckebaum S, Cicinnati VR, Radtke A, Kabar I. Calcineurin inhibitors in liver transplantation—still champions or threatened by serious competitors? Liver Int. 2013;33(5):656–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao K, Lu Y, Wang J, Chen X, Zhang Z, Wang X, et al. Different effects of tacrolimus on innate and adaptive immune cells in the allograft transplantation. Scand J Immunol. 2016;83(2):119–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Guptill JT, Russo MA, Massey JM, Juel VC, Hobson-Webb LD, et al. Tacrolimus inhibits Th1 and Th17 responses in MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis patients. Exp Neurol. 2019;312:43–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miroux C, Morales O, Ghazal K, Othman SB, de Launoit Y, Pancre V, et al. In vitro effects of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus on regulatory T-cell proliferation and function. Transplantation. 2012;94(2):123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoon KH. Efficacy and cytokine modulating effects of tacrolimus in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010: 686480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zuo Z, Wang C, Carpenter D, Okada Y, Nicolaidou E, Toyoda M, et al. Prolongation of allograft survival with viral IL-10 transfection in a highly histoincompatible model of rat heart allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2001;71(5):686–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tashiro H, Shinozaki K, Yahata H, Hayamizu K, Okimoto T, Tanji H, et al. Prolongation of liver allograft survival after interleukin-10 gene transduction 24–48 hours before donation. Transplantation. 2000;70(2):336–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khullar V, Dolganiuc A, Firpi RJ. Pre-and-post transplant considerations in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Transpl. 2014;4(2):81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng M, Wang J, Wu H, Wang M, Cao D, Li J, et al. IL-4 alleviates ischaemia-reperfusion injury by inducing kupffer cells M2 polarization via STAT6-JMJD3 pathway after rat liver transplantation. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2953068.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant No. HI15C3062). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No. NRF-2020R1F1A1075816).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HSN, MJP, YSJ, JYC, YKY and MLC Conception and design of study; HSN, KHC, SYK, JWC, JAB and YKY Acquisition of data; HSN and MJP Analysis and interpretation of data; HSN and MLC Drafting the article; HSN and MLC Revising the article critically; MLC acquired funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Young Kyoung You or Mi-La Cho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, MJ., Na, H.S., Joo, YS. et al. Induction of liver transplant immune tolerance in an outbred rat strain model using tacrolimus. Lab Anim Res 39, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00156-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00156-5

Keywords