Skip to main content
Download PDF

IL-4/IL-4 Ab complex enhances the accumulation of both antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells in mouse lungs infected with influenza A virus

Laboratory Animal Research volume 39, Article number: 32 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Unlike conventional T cells, innate and virtual-memory CD8 T cells in naïve mice acquire their memory phenotypes and functions in the absence of antigenic encounters in a cytokine-dependent manner. The relevant cytokines include interleukin-4 (IL-4), type I interferon, and interleukin-15 (IL-15). Moreover, exogenous IL-4 can also induce de novo generation and/or expansion of the virtual-memory CD8 T cell population. In this study, we investigated whether exogenous IL-4 could enhance the immune response to a viral infection.

Results

In vivo administration of IL-4 and an anti-IL-4 antibody complex (IL-4C) increased CXCR3 expression in both memory and naïve phenotype CD8 T cells in the absence of antigenic stimulation, and protected mice from lethal influenza infection. Flow cytometric analysis of lung-infiltrating immune cells on day 5 after virus infection revealed higher numbers of antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells in IL-4C-treated mice than in control mice. In particular, the bystander CD8 T cells were a naïve or evident memory phenotypes. Crucially, an anti-CXCR3 blocking antibody abrogated this IL-4C effect, reflecting that the increased accumulation of CD8 T cells in the lungs after IL-4C treatment is dependent on CXCR3.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that exogenous IL-4C plays a protective role by enhancing CXCR3-dependent migration of CD8 T cells into influenza-infected lungs.

Background

Conventional memory T cells of both humans and mice are generated from naïve T cells when the cells encounter antigens in peripheral lymphoid organs, followed by cell activation and differentiation. However, some T cells of the thymus and peripheral tissues attain the memory phenotype, although they have never encountered antigens. The prototypes of such antigen-inexperienced memory-like T cells (termed innate T cells) are selected by MHC class Ib molecules during thymocyte development and include natural killer T (NKT) cells, CD8αα+ intra-epithelial T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, and H2-M3-specific CD8 T cells [1,2,3]. In addition, the classic MHC class I- or II-restricted selection pathways induce other innate T cells, including T-T CD4 T cells, Eomes+ innate CD8 T cells, and natural Th1 cells in the thymus [4,5,6,7,8]. Unlike MHC class Ib-restricted innate T cells, such innate T cells exhibit a diverse TCR repertoire. The development of Eomes+ innate CD8 T cells requires interleukin (IL)-4 or type I interferon [3, 6, 7, 9].

Antigen-inexperienced memory-like CD8 T cells are present in the periphery of unimmunized mice including germ-free mice [10]. Such cells are phenotypically similar to Eomes+ innate CD8 T cells [11]. These virtual-memory T cells develop under lymphopenic conditions or are induced by certain cytokines, including IL-4, IL-15, and type I interferon [11,12,13,14]. IL-4 administration to mice triggers the development and expansion of the innate/virtual-memory CD8 T cell population [15]. Previously, we found that IL-4-induced innate CD8 T cells facilitated rapid viral clearance because they evidenced fast early proliferation and effector T cell generation in leukocyte choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) clone-13-infected mice [16].

CXCR3 is a chemokine receptor that has a significant impact on T cell trafficking and function [17]. This chemokine receptor has been reported to be highly expressed in IL-4-induced CD8 innate T cells, along with CD44, CD122, and Eomes [6]. Furthermore, peripheral CD8 T cells reduced in IL-4Rα KO mice exhibited a CD44hiCXCR3+ phenotype [18]. Conversely, the administration of exogenous IL-4/IL-4 Ab complex to mice resulted in the development and expansion of CD44hiCXCR3+ CD8 T cell populations in both thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs [15, 19, 20]. We thus explored whether exogenous IL-4/IL-4 Ab complex could enhance the antiviral CD8 T cell response in influenza-infected mice.

Results

IL-4 and the anti-IL-4 complex protected mice from lethal influenza A infection

To evaluate the effect of IL-4 on both antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells, IL-4 complexed with anti-IL-4 Ab (IL-4C) was injected daily for 7 days. Subsequently, we infected the mice with influenza. The phenotypic changes in peripheral blood CD8 T cells were examined via flow cytometry and the mice were intranasally infected with a lethal dose (6 × 103 pfu/mouse) of PR8 influenza virus (Fig. 1A). As reported previously (15, 20), we found that intraperitoneal IL-4C injection increased the blood numbers of CD44hiCXCR3+ and CD44lowCXCR3+ CD8 T cells (Fig. 1B). Moreover, the survival rate of PR8-infected mice was significantly higher in the IL-4C-treated group than in the phosphate buffered saline (PBS)- or anti-IL-4 Ab-treated groups. IL-4 injection alone did not protect mice from lethal influenza (Fig. 1C). As injected free IL-4 is only transiently active, unlike IL-4C [21], the data suggest that the improved survival of IL-4C-treated mice reflected the in vivo bioactivity of IL-4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

IL-4 and anti-IL-4 antibody complex (IL-4C) treatment protects mice from lethal influenza A virus infection. IL-4 (1.5 µg) and anti-IL-4 antibody (7.5 µg) were mixed and injected intraperitoneally into mice daily for 7 days. On day 8, PBS-treated control and IL-4C-treated mice were intranasally infected with the PR8 strain of influenza A virus. A The experimental protocol. B Peripheral blood cells were collected from control and IL-4C-treated mice before (Pre) and after (D0) PBS or IL-4C administration, and the expression levels of CD44 and CXCR3 in CD8 T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The numbers in the dot plots are the percentages of cells in each quadrant. The data are the means ± SDs (n = 5/group); the x-numbers indicate fold changes. C The survival of influenza-infected mice was monitored daily for 15 days for the PBS control (n = 35), IL-4C (n = 35), IL-4-only (n = 5), and anti-IL-4 Ab-only treated groups (n = 5). Statistical analysis was measured using an unpaired t-test and Mantel–Cox test. n.s, not significant. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001

Full size image

IL-4 and the anti-IL-4 complex enhanced CD8 T cell accumulation in influenza-infected lungs

The lungs, lymph nodes, and spleens of infected mice were harvested 5 days after PR8 infection and the CD8-expressing T cells were analyzed via flow cytometry. There were twice as many CD8 T cells in the lungs of IL-4C-treated mice as in the controls (p < 0.01), but lymph node and spleen numbers did not significantly differ (Fig. 2A). IL-4C increased the numbers of CD44hi CD8 T cells in all organs (Fig. 2B); as expected, the proportion of CXCR3+ CD8 T cells was higher in IL-4C-treated mice than in controls (Fig. 2C). On a per cell basis, Eomes expression in CD8 T cells, which is associated with effector/memory functions, was also upregulated in IL-4C-treated mice (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

IL-4C enhances CD8 T cell accumulation and CXCR3 and Eomes expression in CD8 T cells. On day 5 after influenza infection, lymphocytes were harvested from the lungs, peribronchial lymph nodes (LNs), and spleens, and CD8 T cells were analyzed via flow cytometry. Total (A) and CD44hi memory-phenotype (B) CD8 T cell numbers were counted. The results are the means ± SDs (n = 15/group); the x-numbers indicate fold changes. The percentage of CXCR3+ CD8 cells (C) and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Eomes expression in CD8 T cells (D). Representative plots are shown on the left; the numbers in the dot plots are the cell percentages in each quadrant. The summarized data are the means ± SDs (n = 5/group); the x-numbers are the fold changes. Statistical analysis was measured using an unpaired t-test. n.s, not significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Next, we investigated whether IL-4C expanded the populations of antigen-specific effector/memory CD8 T cells. CD8 T cells were stained with H2-Db pentamers containing NP366–374 and PA224–233 peptides. As shown in Fig. 3A, NP366–374 and PA224–233 peptide-specific CD8 T cell proportions in the lungs and lymph nodes did not differ between IL-4C-treated mice and controls (refer to the dot plot of LN and spleen in Additional file 1: Fig. S1). When influenza-specific CD8 T cell responses were assessed via ex vivo restimulation with influenza NP366–374 peptides, the proportions of interferon-γ (IFN-γ)- or tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-producing lung CD8 T cells were comparable between control and treated mice (Fig. 3B). However, the lungs of IL-4C-treated mice had approximately threefold more influenza virus-specific CD8 T cells (as revealed by pentamer-binding or ex vivo cytokine production), although the differences in cytokine-producing cell numbers did not attain statistical significance (Fig. 3C). Moreover, the numbers of both pentamer-negative CD44hi memory-phenotype and CD44low naïve-phenotype CD8 T cells in the lungs were significantly increased by IL-4C treatment (p < 0.05; Fig. 3D). Notably, the differences in cell number between the two groups were greatest for the pentamer-negative, CD44hi memory-phenotype cell population, most of which were bystander memory CD8 T cells. Together, these data indicate that IL-4C enhanced the accumulation of both antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells in infected lungs.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Influenza-specific and bystander CD8 T cell numbers are higher in IL-4C-treated mice than in controls. Cells were isolated from lungs, peribronchial lymph nodes (LNs), and spleens on day 5 after influenza infection. A CD8 T cells from each organ were stained with H-2Db/NP366–374 and H-2Db/PA224–233 pentamers (H-2Db/NP&PA) and analyzed via flow cytometry. Representative dot plots and the summarized proportions of virus-specific CD8 T cells are shown. The numbers in the dot plots are pentamer+ cell percentages. B Cells from lungs were restimulated ex vivo with NP366–374 peptides in the presence of monensin for 5 h and then stained with anti-IFN-γ or TNF-α antibodies. Representative dot plots and the summarized proportions of cytokine-producing CD8 T cells are shown. The numbers in the dot plots are cytokine-producing cell percentages. C Flow cytometry yielded the antigen-specific (pentamer-, IFN-γ-, or TNF-α-positive) and D bystander (pentamer-negative CD44hi or CD44low) CD8 T cell numbers. The data are the means ± SDs (n = 5 or 10/group); the x-values are fold changes. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t-test. n.s, not significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Full size image

Increased accumulation of CD8 T cells in influenza-infected lungs after IL-4C treatment is dependent on CXCR3

To explore the mechanism underlying the enhanced accumulation of CD8 T cells in infected lungs after IL-4C treatment, we focused on the CXCR3 protein that recruits antigen-specific CD8 T cells to the lungs during respiratory virus infection [22, 23]. Anti-CXCR3-blocking antibodies were intraperitoneally injected into control and IL-4C-treated mice, followed by intranasal PR8 infection (on the same day). On day 5 post infection, CD8 T cell numbers and phenotypes were analyzed. As expected, the anti-CXCR3 antibody reduced the effect of IL-4C on the accumulation of both CD44hi and CD44low cells (Fig. 4A), reflecting CXCR3 upregulation (in both cell populations) by IL-4C (Fig. 2C). However, CXCR3 expression in CD4 T cells and CD4 T cell infiltration into infected lungs were not affected by IL-4C (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, transcription of the Cxcl10 gene, which encodes the principal CXCR3 ligand in influenza-infected lungs [24], was not affected by IL-4C (Fig. 4C), suggesting that IL-4-driven CXCR3 upregulation in both CD44hi and CD44low CD8 T cells caused such cells to accumulate in inflamed lungs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Anti-CXCR3 antibody inhibits IL-4C-induced CD8 T cell accumulation in the lungs. After IL-4C injection daily for 7 days, control and IL-4C-treated mice were intraperitoneally injected with 500 µg amounts of anti-CXCR3 Ab, followed by influenza A infection. Lungs were harvested 5 days after infection. A CD44hi and CD44low CD8 T cell numbers were determined via flow cytometry. The data are the means ± SDs (n = 4–5/group). B CD44hi and CD44low CD4 T cell numbers were determined. The data are the means ± SDs (n = 5/group). (C) Cxcl10 transcript levels were measured using real-time PCR and normalized to the expression levels of the Gapdh gene. The data are means ± SDs (n = 12/group); the x-values are fold changes. n.s, not significant. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t-test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Full size image

Next, we assessed whether IL-4C affected the early innate immune response. The numbers of neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes and eosinophils did not differ on day 1 or 5 after PR8 infection between the IL-4C and control groups, although the numbers of alveolar macrophages were lower in the IL-4C-treted group (Fig. 5A). The anti-PR8 HA antibody titers in sera of control and IL-4C-treated mice were negligible on day 5 after influenza infection, suggesting that such antibodies did not contribute to the survival improvement of treated mice at the early time of influenza infection (Fig. 5B). Similarly, no significant differences in virus titer were observed in the lung (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

IL-4C has no impact on innate cell infiltration or antibody titer. Cells were isolated from the lungs of IL-4 treated and control mice. A The numbers of innate immune cells (alveolar macrophage (AM), inflammatory monocyte (iMono), neutrophil and eosinophil) were counted via flow cytometry on days 1 and 5 after influenza A infection. The data are the means ± SDs (n = 5/group); the x numbers indicate fold changes. B Sera of IL-4-treated and control mice were collected 5 days after influenza A infection, and the anti-PR8 antibody titers were assessed via ELISA. Sera obtained 20 days after influenza infection of naïve mice served as the positive (+) control. C Virus titers in the lungs of each group were analyzed by plaque assay. A pooled graph is shown (n = 12/group). The x-values represent fold change. The data are the means ± SD (n = 9/group). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t-test and Mann–Whitney test. n.s, not significant. *p < 0.0; **p < 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

Here, we protected mice from lethal influenza infection by administering IL-4 in complex with anti-IL-4 Ab. As expected, IL-4C injection increased the number of influenza-specific CD8 T cells in infected lungs. However, the increase principally featured bystander CD44hi CD8 T cells that could not recognize the influenza NP and PA epitopes. Moreover, the number of CD44low naïve phenotype CD8 T cells was also higher in the lungs of treated mice. We further found that augmented infiltration of both virus-specific and bystander CD8 T cells was dependent on CXCR3, the expression of which was upregulated in both naïve and memory CD8 T cells in response to IL-4C.

CXCR3 is a key chemokine receptor for migration into sites of inflammation, and is rapidly upregulated in CD8 T cells following antigen recognition and cell activation via interaction with dendritic cells [17, 25, 26]. Three CXCR3 ligands are known: CXCL9 (monokine induced by γ-interferon, MIG), CXCL10 (interferon-induced protein of 10 kDa, IP-10), and CXCL11 (interferon-induced T cell α chemoattractant, I-TAC). The expression of these ligands at sites of inflammation is induced by IFN-γ; all elicit migration of CXCR3-expressing cells [27]. In influenza-infected lungs, CXCL10 is the major CD8 T cell recruiter [24]. Previously, we showed that CXCR3+ cells in mice constitute approximately 60% of memory CD8 T cells and that IL-4C increased that proportion to approximately 80% in the absence of antigenic stimulation [15]. Moreover, a similar effect was evident in terms of CD44low naïve phenotype CD8 T cells. Only approximately 10% of CD44low CD8 T cells in the spleens of naïve mice expressed surface CXCR3; this increased to 85% in IL-4C-treated mice. Thus, IL-4C enhanced the migration of both antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells into inflamed lungs after influenza infection by triggering antigen-independent upregulation of CXCR3 expression in CD8 T cells.

Most IL-4-induced innate CD8 T cells express CXCR3 [7]; such cells enhance immunity against bacterial infection and cancer [28]. CXCR3+ naïve CD8 T cells are also functionally superior to CXCR3− naïve cells in terms of cytokine production and effector function [29]. Thus, it may be that IL-4-induced CXCR3 upregulation in both memory and naïve T cells contributes to antitumor immunity. However, this has not been confirmed, although IL-4 has potent antitumor effects in several mouse models [30,31,32].

In this study, IL-4C treatment had no effect on the expression of CXCR3 on CD4 T cells and their migration into the inflamed lung, in contrast to CD8 T cells. While approximately 20% of splenic CD8 T cells in naïve mice exhibit a CXCR3+ virtual memory phenotype [15], only a very small population of CD4 T cells in naïve mice displays a similar phenotype. It remains undocumented whether the CXCR3+ memory phenotype CD4 T cells in naïve mice are the counterparts of virtual memory CD8 T cells. Furthermore, CXCR3 expression on CD4 T cells is associated with Th1 differentiation, which is typically IL-12 and IFN-γ rather than IL-4 dependent [17]. Taking these, it appears that IL-4C has a limited effect on CXCR3 expression in CD4 T cells compared to CD8 T cells, although the specific mechanism underlying this difference has not been elucidated.

In this study, we did not observe any significant differences in viral titers and antiviral antibody levels between IL-4-pretreated mice and the control group. These findings suggest that IL-4C treatment did not improve the survival of influenza-infected mice by enhancing the antiviral antibody response. Additionally, the improved survival rate observed in IL-4C-treated mice following influenza infection does not appear to be solely due to enhanced effector function of CD8 T cells. Severe influenza infection is associated with lung epithelial damage due to excessive infiltration of inflammatory cells, particularly neutrophils and monocytes [33]. Previous studies have reported that IL-4 administration alleviates lung damage via macrophage reprogramming in models of acute lung injury [34]. In addition, IL-4 promoted lung epithelial cell regeneration in sepsis-induced acute lung injury by polarizing macrophages to the M2 type. IL-4 has also been shown to attenuate neutrophil migration into inflamed tissue [35, 36]. IL-4Rα signaling suppresses acute lung injury by inhibiting neutrophil survival [37]. Given these findings, it is plausible that exogenous IL-4 treatment may prevent lung injury by inducing macrophage M2 polarization and/or limiting neutrophil infiltration or survival, although no significant differences were found in the number of macrophages and neutrophil in infected lungs between IL-4C-treated and control mice.

Conclusions

Exogenous IL-4 protected mice against lethal influenza infection. Such treatment markedly increased CXCR3 expression in both memory and naïve CD8 T cells, enhancing the migration of both antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells into inflamed lungs after infection. Our results afford new insight into the role played by IL-4-induced virtual- memory CD8 T cells in antiviral immunity.

Methods

Mice, infection, and ethics

All mice were maintained under a 12:12 light–dark cycle in specific pathogen free conditions at animal care facilities of the Biomedical Center for Animal Resource Development of Seoul National University and the Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute under specific pathogen free conditions. All mice were housed in groups of as many as 5 mice per cage with a temperature set point of 22 ± 1 °C and humidity of 50 ± 10%. C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Koatech (Pyeongtaek, Korea). As described previously [15, 20], 1.5 µg mouse IL-4 (Peprotech, Princeton, NJ, USA) and 7.5 µg antibody against mouse IL-4 (11B11; Bio X Cell, West Lebanon, NH, USA) were mixed in 200 μL PBS and intraperitoneally injected into mice daily for 7 days. Control mice received only PBS, IL-4, or anti-IL-4 Ab. One day after the final injection, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and infected with influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1, PR8) virus intranasally; animal health and behavior were checked every day up to 15 days after infection. Mice were euthanized if they showed the following symptoms and signs: abnormal respiration, significant lethargy, or moribund appearance. In some experiments, mice were sacrificed after 5 days of infection, and the immune cell profiles of the lungs, lymph nodes, and spleens were assessed via flow cytometry.

Flow cytometric analysis

Single-cell suspensions of lungs, lymph nodes, and spleens were prepared. Lungs were placed in 5 mL of RPMI-1640 medium with 1 mg/mL type IV collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp, Lakewood, NJ, USA) and 0.05 mg/mL DNAse I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 1 mL of Red Blood Cell Lysing buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) and washed. Fluorochrome-tagged monoclonal antibodies were purchased from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA, USA) or BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA): anti-CD3 (145–2C11, 17A2), anti-CD4 (RM4–5), anti-CD8 (53–6.7), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CXCR3 (CXCR3–173), anti-EOMES (Dan11mag), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-CCR2 (475301), anti-Gr-1 (RB6.8C5), anti-Siglec F (E50–2440), and anti-CD11c (HL3). Influenza virus-specific CD8 T cells were detected using biotin-labeled H-2Db/NP366–374 (ASNENMETM) and PA224–233 (SSLENFRAYV) pentamers [38]. Both pentamers were purchased from ProImmune (Oxford, UK). Cells were suspended with antibodies in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (1 × PBS with 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and 0.1% (w/v) sodium azide) for 30 min at 4 °C. Intracellular staining using a mixture of the fixation and permeabilization buffers of the Foxp3 staining kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) was followed. After staining, samples were analyzed using BD LSRFortessa, LSRII, or LSRFortessa X-20 platforms (Becton–Dickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA) running FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).

Intracellular cytokine staining

To measure cytokine production by CD8 T cells, 5 × 105 cells were incubated with 1 µg/mL influenza virus NP366–374 peptide (Cosmogenetech, Seoul, Korea), 10 U/mL IL-2 (Peprotech, Princeton, NJ, USA), and 4 µL/6 mL monensin (BD Bioscience) for 5 h at 37 °C in a 5% (v/v) CO2 incubator. The cells were collected, stained with anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) and anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22) antibodies and subjected to flow cytometry.

Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR

Lungs were homogenized in 1 mL of TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). After RNA extraction, cDNA was synthesized using AccuPower CycleScript RT PreMix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea). PowerUp SYBRTM Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to perform real-time quantitative PCR. The primers were as follows: IP-10 (CXCL-10) forward 5ʹ-GAC GGT CCG CTG CAA CTG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-CTT CCC TAT GGC CCT CAT TCT-3ʹ [39] and GAPDH, forward 5ʹ-TCA CCA CCA TGG AGA AGG C-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-GCT AAG CAG TTG GTG GTG CA-3ʹ [40].

ELISA

Influenza virus-specific antibodies were measured via ELISA as described previously [41]. Ninety-six-well plates were coated with 1 µg/mL influenza A H1N1 (A/Puerto Rico/8/1934) hemagglutinin (HA; Sino Biological Inc., Wayne, PA, USA). Plates were blocked with 1 × casein solution buffer (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) for 2 h at 37 °C and washed with PBS-Tween 20 buffer. Then, twofold dilutions of serum samples were added, followed by incubation for 1 h and incubation with anti-mouse IgG HRP (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C. The plates were developed with tetramethylbenzidine (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 10 min and absorbances at 450 nm were measured using an Epoch device (Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA).

Plaque assay

The virus titration was measured by plaque assay [42]. Briefly, monolayers of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells were prepared in 6-well plate and incubated for 24 h. MDCK cells in culture were washed thoroughly with PBS at least twice, followed by the additional of 100 μl of lung lysate solution in serial dilution for 1 h. Infected MDCK cells were washed and added < 1% SeaPlaque™ Agarose (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) containing 1 μg/ml of L-(tosylamido-2-phenyl) ethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) -trypsin (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA). After 3–4 days of incubation at 37℃, agarose was removed and plates were fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution and stained 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed as described in the figure legends using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, CA, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

I-TAC:

Interferon-induced T cell α chemoattractant

IFN-γ:

Interferon-γ

IL-15:

Interleukin-15

IL-4:

Interleukin-4

IL-4C:

Interleukin-4 and an anti-interleukin-4 antibody complex

LCMV:

Leukocyte choriomeningitis virus

MAIT:

Mucosal-associated invariant T

MIG:

Monokine induced by γ-interferon

NKT:

Natural killer T

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PR8:

Influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34

TNF-α:

Tumor-necrosis factor-α

References

  1. Berg LJ. Signalling through TEC kinases regulates conventional versus innate CD8(+) T-cell development. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(6):479–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veillette A, Dong Z, Latour S. Consequence of the SLAM-SAP signaling pathway in innate-like and conventional lymphocytes. Immunity. 2007;27(5):698–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee YJ, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Alternative memory in the CD8 T cell lineage. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(2):50–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Li W, Kim MG, Gourley TS, McCarthy BP, Sant’Angelo DB, Chang CH. An alternate pathway for CD4 T cell development: thymocyte-expressed MHC class II selects a distinct T cell population. Immunity. 2005;23(4):375–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi EY, Jung KC, Park HJ, Chung DH, Song JS, Yang SD, et al. Thymocyte–thymocyte interaction for efficient positive selection and maturation of CD4 T cells. Immunity. 2005;23(4):387–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinreich MA, Odumade OA, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. T cells expressing the transcription factor PLZF regulate the development of memory-like CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(8):709–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Min HS, Lee YJ, Jeon YK, Kim EJ, Kang BH, Jung KC, et al. MHC class II-restricted interaction between thymocytes plays an essential role in the production of innate CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2011;186(10):5749–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang BH, Park HJ, Yum HI, Park SP, Park JK, Kang EH, et al. Thymic low affinity/avidity interaction selects natural Th1 cells. J Immunol. 2015;194(12):5861–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinet V, Tonon S, Torres D, Azouz A, Nguyen M, Kohler A, et al. Type I interferons regulate eomesodermin expression and the development of unconventional memory CD8(+) T cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haluszczak C, Akue AD, Hamilton SE, Johnson LD, Pujanauski L, Teodorovic L, et al. The antigen-specific CD8+ T cell repertoire in unimmunized mice includes memory phenotype cells bearing markers of homeostatic expansion. J Exp Med. 2009;206(2):435–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Akue AD, Lee JY, Jameson SC. Derivation and maintenance of virtual memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2012;188(6):2516–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. White JT, Cross EW, Burchill MA, Danhorn T, McCarter MD, Rosen HR, et al. Virtual memory T cells develop and mediate bystander protective immunity in an IL-15-dependent manner. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lauvau G, Goriely S. Memory CD8+ T cells: orchestrators and key players of innate immunity? PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(9):e1005722.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pribikova M, Moudra A, Stepanek O. Opinion: virtual memory CD8 T cells and lymphopenia-induced memory CD8 T cells represent a single subset: homeostatic memory T cells. Immunol Lett. 2018;203:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park HJ, Lee A, Lee JI, Park SH, Ha SJ, Jung KC. Effect of IL-4 on the development and function of memory-like CD8 T cells in the peripheral lymphoid tissues. Immune Netw. 2016;16(2):126–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee A, Park SP, Park CH, Kang BH, Park SH, Ha SJ, et al. IL-4 induced innate CD8+ T cells control persistent viral infection. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(10):e1005193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Groom JR, Luster AD. CXCR3 in T cell function. Exp Cell Res. 2011;317(5):620–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Renkema KR, Lee JY, Lee YJ, Hamilton SE, Hogquist KA, Jameson SC. IL-4 sensitivity shapes the peripheral CD8+ T cell pool and response to infection. J Exp Med. 2016;213(7):1319–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. White JT, Cross EW, Kedl RM. Antigen-inexperienced memory CD8(+) T cells: where they come from and why we need them. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(6):391–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ventre E, Brinza L, Schicklin S, Mafille J, Coupet CA, Marcais A, et al. Negative regulation of NKG2D expression by IL-4 in memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2012;189(7):3480–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Finkelman FD, Madden KB, Morris SC, Holmes JM, Boiani N, Katona IM, et al. Anti-cytokine antibodies as carrier proteins. Prolongation of in vivo effects of exogenous cytokines by injection of cytokine-anti-cytokine antibody complexes. J Immunol. 1993;151(3):1235–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindell DM, Lane TE, Lukacs NW. CXCL10/CXCR3-mediated responses promote immunity to respiratory syncytial virus infection by augmenting dendritic cell and CD8(+) T cell efficacy. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(8):2168–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fadel SA, Bromley SK, Medoff BD, Luster AD. CXCR3-deficiency protects influenza-infected CCR5-deficient mice from mortality. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(12):3376–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wareing MD, Lyon AB, Lu B, Gerard C, Sarawar SR. Chemokine expression during the development and resolution of a pulmonary leukocyte response to influenza A virus infection in mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76(4):886–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim CH, Rott L, Kunkel EJ, Genovese MC, Andrew DP, Wu L, et al. Rules of chemokine receptor association with T cell polarization in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2001;108(9):1331–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie JH, Nomura N, Lu M, Chen SL, Koch GE, Weng Y, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of the CXCR3 chemokine receptor results in diminished recruitment of T helper 1 cells into sites of inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;73(6):771–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Groom JR, Luster AD. CXCR3 ligands: redundant, collaborative and antagonistic functions. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011;89(2):207–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oghumu S, Terrazas CA, Varikuti S, Kimble J, Vadia S, Yu L, et al. CXCR3 expression defines a novel subset of innate CD8+ T cells that enhance immunity against bacterial infection and cancer upon stimulation with IL-15. FASEB J. 2015;29(3):1019–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Simone G, Mazza EMC, Cassotta A, Davydov AN, Kuka M, Zanon V, et al. CXCR3 identifies human naive CD8(+) T cells with enhanced effector differentiation potential. J Immunol. 2019;203(12):3179–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tepper RI, Pattengale PK, Leder P. Murine interleukin-4 displays potent anti-tumor activity in vivo. Cell. 1989;57(3):503–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Golumbek PT, Lazenby AJ, Levitsky HI, Jaffee LM, Karasuyama H, Baker M, et al. Treatment of established renal cancer by tumor cells engineered to secrete interleukin-4. Science. 1991;254(5032):713–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pippin BA, Rosenstein M, Jacob WF, Chiang Y, Lotze MT. Local IL-4 delivery enhances immune reactivity to murine tumors: gene therapy in combination with IL-2. Cancer Gene Ther. 1994;1(1):35–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perrone LA, Plowden JK, Garcia-Sastre A, Katz JM, Tumpey TM. H5N1 and 1918 pandemic influenza virus infection results in early and excessive infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils in the lungs of mice. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4(8):e1000115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. D’Alessio FR, Craig JM, Singer BD, Files DC, Mock JR, Garibaldi BT, et al. Enhanced resolution of experimental ARDS through IL-4-mediated lung macrophage reprogramming. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;310(8):L733–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen F, Liu Z, Wu W, Rozo C, Bowdridge S, Millman A, et al. An essential role for TH2-type responses in limiting acute tissue damage during experimental helminth infection. Nat Med. 2012;18(2):260–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Woytschak J, Keller N, Krieg C, Impellizzieri D, Thompson RW, Wynn TA, et al. Type 2 Interleukin-4 receptor signaling in neutrophils antagonizes their expansion and migration during infection and inflammation. Immunity. 2016;45(1):172–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris AJ, Mirchandani AS, Lynch RW, Murphy F, Delaney L, Small D, et al. IL4Ralpha signaling abrogates hypoxic neutrophil survival and limits acute lung injury responses in vivo. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(2):235–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pang KC, Sanders MT, Monaco JJ, Doherty PC, Turner SJ, Chen W. Immunoproteasome subunit deficiencies impact differentially on two immunodominant influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses. J Immunol. 2006;177(11):7680–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ibrahim HM, Nishimura M, Tanaka S, Awadin W, Furuoka H, Xuan X, et al. Overproduction of Toxoplasma gondii cyclophilin-18 regulates host cell migration and enhances parasite dissemination in a CCR5-independent manner. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Giulietti A, Overbergh L, Valckx D, Decallonne B, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. An overview of real-time quantitative PCR: applications to quantify cytokine gene expression. Methods. 2001;25(4):386–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grodeland G, Baranowska-Hustad M, Abadejos J, Blane TR, Teijaro J, Nemazee D, et al. Induction of cross-reactive and protective antibody responses after DNA vaccination with MHCII-targeted stem domain from influenza hemagglutinin. Front Immunol. 2020;11:431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Baer A, Kehn-Hall K. Viral concentration determination through plaque assays: using traditional and novel overlay systems. J Vis Exp. 2014;93:e52065.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Young Ki Choi of Chungbuk National University for providing us with the influenza A virus.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Korean government (Grant No. 2018R1D1A1B07043802) and the Research Fund from Seoul National University Hospital (Grant No. 0320200120).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Course of Translational Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea

    Hi Jung Park, Eun Ah Choi, Sung Min Choi, Jae Il Lee & Kyeong Cheon Jung

  2. Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea

    Jae Il Lee & Kyeong Cheon Jung

  3. Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea

    Jae Il Lee

  4. Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28644, South Korea

    Young-Ki Choi

  5. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea

    Kyeong Cheon Jung

  6. Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea

    Kyeong Cheon Jung

Authors
  1. Hi Jung Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eun Ah Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sung Min Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Young-Ki Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jae Il Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kyeong Cheon Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.J.P. performed most of the in vivo and in vitro experiments and wrote the original draft. S.M.C. and E.A.C. contributed to the animal experiments. Y.K.C. provided influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1, PR8) virus and advised the animal experiment. J.I.L. analyzed the final data and edited the manuscript. K.C.J. directed the experiment design, analyzed the final data and edited the final manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jae Il Lee or Kyeong Cheon Jung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Supplementary figure S1. Cells were isolated from peribronchial lymph nodes (LNs) and spleens on day 5 after influenza infection. CD8 T cells from each organ were stained with H-2Db/NP366–374 and H-2Db/PA224–233 pentamers (H-2Db/NP&PA) and analyzed via flow cytometry. Representative dot plots of virus-specific CD8 T cells are shown. The numbers in the dot plots are pentamer+ cell percentages.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, H.J., Choi, E.A., Choi, S.M. et al. IL-4/IL-4 Ab complex enhances the accumulation of both antigen-specific and bystander CD8 T cells in mouse lungs infected with influenza A virus. Lab Anim Res 39, 32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00183-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00183-2

Keywords

Laboratory Animal Research

ISSN: 2233-7660