Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of Artemisia dubia folium extract-mediated immune efficacy through developing a murine model for acute and chronic stages of atopic dermatitis

Laboratory Animal Research volume 40, Article number: 13 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a biphasic type of skin inflammation characterized by a predominance of type-2 (TH2) and type-1 (TH1) helper T cell-biased immune responses at the acute and persistent chronic phases, respectively. The present study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Artemisia dubia folium extract (ADFE) on AD-like skin lesions through developing a murine model for acute and chronic stages of AD. To induce acute phase AD, the dorsal skin of BALB/c mice was sensitized twice a week with 1% 2, 4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), followed by challenge (twice) in the following week with 0.2% DNCB. To induce persistent chronic AD, some mice were challenged twice a week for 4 more weeks. After the second challenge, the dorsal skin was exposed to 3% ADFE (five times per week) for 2 weeks (acute phase) or 4 weeks (persistent chronic phase).

Results

The paradigm of TH2 or TH1 predominance at the acute and chronic phase, respectively, was observed in this mouse model. During the acute phase, we observed an increased IL-4/IFN-γ ratio in splenic culture supernatants, an increased IgG1/IgG2a ratio in serum, and elevated serum IgE levels; however, the skew toward TH2 responses was diminished during the chronic stage. Compared with vehicle controls, ADFE reduced the IL-4/IFN-γ and IgG1/IgG2a ratios in acute AD, but both ratios increased during the chronic stage.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that ADFE concomitantly suppresses the TH2 predominant response in acute AD, as well as the TH1 predominant response in chronic AD. Thus, ADFE is a candidate therapeutic for AD.

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is caused by progressive inflammation of the skin, giving rise to pruritic eczematous skin lesions [1]. The clinical manifestations of AD arise through interactions between genetic, environmental, and immunological factors [2]. The primary defect in skin barrier function allows penetration by external antigens, which interact with local antigen-presenting cells and immune effector cells, thereby triggering a systemic immune response [3]. The immunological characteristics of AD differ according to whether the immune response is driven primarily by type-1 helper T lymphocytes (TH1) or type-2 helper T lymphocytes (TH2) [4]. Early phase acute AD (aAD) is characterized by erythema, eczema, and pruritus, all caused by a predominant TH2-mediated immune response via increased production of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, and a decrease in production of IL-12 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) [5]. IL-4 secreted by TH2 cells, mast cells, or other constituent cells triggers B cell isotype switching to secrete IgE and IgG1 [6]. By contrast, persistent chronic AD (cAD) is characterized by dry, thickened, and lichenified skin, and is driven primarily by a TH1-mediated immune response associated with production of IFN-γ and IL-12 [4, 7].

Currently, few therapeutic or preventive measures have a positive effect on AD. Maintenance of epidermal homeostasis and inhibition of inflammatory responses using phototherapy, monoclonal antibodies, steroids, or calcineurin inhibitors are common practices worldwide [8, 9], but these approaches have several side effects [10]. Therefore, alternative medicinal trials using natural ingredients such as herbal extracts have been undertaken to identify substances that prevent or treat AD with minimal side effects [11].

Herbal products have been used worldwide for a very long time to cure and prevent skin inflammation [12,13,14]. Traditionally, Artemisia dubia has been used to treat microorganism infection including parasitic disease, cancerous diseases, or skin wounds in South Asia countries [15,16,17,18]. Different parts of the Artemisia dubia plant contain triterpenoids (calotropoleanyl ester, α -amyrin), various very-long-chain fatty acids (e.g. nonacosanoic acid, docosanoic acid, tetracosanoic acid), glycerols (e.g. 1-(O-tricosanoyl) glycerol, 1-(O-pentacosanoyl) glycerol, β-sistosterol, and flavonoids [19, 20]. Flavonoids of medicinal plant origin exert anti-inflammatory effects both in vitro and in vivo [21]. Although different species of Artemisia (A. apiacea or A. argyi) ameliorate AD-like skin lesions in mice [22, 23], no report to date has examined the immunomodulatory potency of Artemisia dubia in the context of the balance between TH2 or TH1 responses during the acute or chronic phases of AD.

The present study aimed to evaluate the ability of Artemisia dubia folium extract (ADFE) to alleviate AD-like skin lesions through developing a murine model for acute and chronic stages of AD, which was generated by dermal application of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). Then, both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses were evaluated in the context of TH2 or TH1 predominance during the acute and chronic phases. The histopathological and immunologic features of the DNCB murine model are similar to those in humans with AD, showing predominance of TH2-mediated humoral and cellular immune response during the acute phase after challenge with DNCB for 2 weeks [24,25,26]. In addition, we examined the efficacy of ADFE during the chronic phase, which was induced experimentally by additional DNCB challenge for a further 4 weeks (i.e., 6 weeks in total).

Methods

Animals and experimental protocols

Male BALB/c mice (4 weeks of age; 15–18 g) were purchased from a local animal supplier of laboratory animals (Daehan BioLink, Korea). The mice were housed in a controlled environment (temperature 22 ± 2 °C; relative humidity 50 ± 5%; 12 h light–dark cycle) in a laminar flow cabinet and had access to standard rodent chow and autoclaved distilled water ad libitum. All animal maintenance and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [27] and were approved by Daegu Catholic University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC-2018–050). After acclimatization for 1 wk, the mice were randomly allocated into eight groups of five mice per group: Group 1 comprised aAD mice treated with ADFE (aAD( +)/ADFE); Group 2 comprised non-aAD mice treated with ADFE (aAD(-)/ADFE); Group 3 comprised aAD mice treated with 10% ethanol (EtOH), the vehicle used to dissolve ADFE (aAD( +)/EtOH); Group 4 comprised non-aAD mice treated with 10% EtOH (aAD(-)/EtOH); Group 5 comprised aAD not treated at all after aAD induction (aAD( +)); Group 6 comprised non-aAD mice not treated at all (aAD(-)); Group 7 comprised cAD mice treated with ADFE (cAD( +)/ ADFE); and Group 8 comprised cAD mice treated with 10% EtOH (cAD( +)/ EtOH).

Preparation of Artemisia dubia folium extract

Artemisia dubia folium was collected in Rimuwa region (27.9973°N, 83.4483°E) of Nepal, and confirmed by the Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Nepal and verified by the Nepalese Government, Department of Plant Resources (DPR, NPRL-1, 074/76 522) prior to arrival in the Republic of Korea. The dried leaves were extracted with tenfold (w/w) 80% ethanol at a temperature of 55 ± 2 °C using a reflux extractor (MS-DMS634, Thermoline Scientific, Australia). The extracted solution was filtered through Whatman number 2 filter paper (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) with a pore size of 8 μm, followed by concentration in a rotary evaporator (SB-1200, Eyela, China) at 55 ± 2 °C. The concentrated extract was then lyophilized (SFDSM12, Samwon, Korea). The ADFE was dissolved in 10% ethanol vehicle to a final concentration of 3% immediately before application to mice, and this single concentration has been used throughout all ADFE treatments. The amount of endotoxin in the ADFE was examined using a Kinetic Chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay (Lonza, Switzerland). The endotoxin concentration was below the level of detection.

Induction of AD-like skin lesions in mice, and administration of the extract

AD was induced as described previously [13, 25, 28]. Briefly, on the day before sensitization, the dorsal skin surface was shaved from the shoulder to the hip (2 × 4 cm) using an electric clipper. Mice were sensitized by two applications (100 μl each) of 1% DNCB or vehicle (acetone: olive oil 4:1; AOO) within 1 week. The mice were then challenged twice with 100 μl of 0.2% DNCB or vehicle on the following week. To induce chronic AD, mice were challenged repeatedly for 5 weeks. ADFE (3%, 200 μl/treatment) or vehicle was applied five times per week for 2 weeks to mice in the early aAD group and for 4 weeks in the cAD group, starting 2 days after the second DNCB challenge (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram showing induction of acute atopic dermatitis (A) and chronic atopic dermatitis (B) in mice. Sensitization with 1% 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) is indicated by ⬆, challenge with 0.2% DNCB by ▴, and application of 3% Artemisia dubia folium extract or vehicle (10% ethanol) by ●

Full size image

Haematology and histopathology

Cardiac blood was collected from mice at the time of sacrifice (Day 28 for the aAD groups and Day 42 for the cAD groups) through isoflurane (Hana Pharm Co., Korea) inhalation, and hematologic analyses were performed immediately. The percentages of total white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils were calculated by an automated hematology analyzer (ADIVA 2120, Siemens, Germany). Treated skin Sects. (2 × 4 cm) were sampled aseptically and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution. The skin segments were stained with hematoxylin and eosin prior to histopathological analysis, to observe epidermal hyperplasia and inflammatory cell infiltration. Histopathological observation was undertaken by a certified pathologist at the Preclinical Research Center, Daegu Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Republic of Korea. Epidermal thickness was measured by a slide scanner following conversion into digital images.

Measurement of splenic T cell cytokines

After sacrifice, the spleen was collected aseptically, and a single cell suspension was prepared. Splenic T cells were stimulated in vitro with immobilized anti-CD3 for 48 h in a 37 °C/5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatants were harvested following stimulation and used for evaluating the levels of various cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) using sandwich ELISA kits (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New jersey, USA).

Measurement of serological parameters

Blood was collected from the periorbital plexus under isoflurane anesthesia 1 day before the first sensitization, 1 day after the second challenge, and 1 day after the sixth challenge, and by cardiac puncture at the time of sacrifice. Serum was prepared and used for evaluating levels of IgE, IgG1, and IgG2a by sandwich ELISA, as described elsewhere [28]. Serum histamine levels were measured using a histamine ELISA kit (LDN, Nordhorn, Germany).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using Sigma Plot 14.0 (Systat Software Inc, San Jose, CA, USA). Depending on the normality of the data, the statistical significance of differences among subgroups with aAD and cAD was tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test, Holm-sidak pairwise comparison, or Tukey’s test. Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney rank-sum tests were performed to determine the statistical differences between the two groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Effect of ADFE on development of AD-like skin lesions

Application of DNCB to the dorsal skin of mice for 2 weeks induced characteristics typical of early aAD, including skin dryness followed by erythema, eczema, exudation, and pruritus (Additional Fig. 1A). Application of 3% ADFE to the dorsal skin for 2 weeks after induction of AD (aAD( +)/ADFE) led to an improvement in the condition of the skin (Additional Fig. 1B). Similarly, application of DNCB for 6 weeks led to dry, thickened, and lichenified skin with fibrotic papules, characteristics typical of cAD (Additional Fig. 1C). However, cAD( +)/ADFE mice showed no prominent improvement in skin lesions after 4 weeks application of ADFE (Additional Fig. 1D).

Histopathological or haematological changes after treatment with ADFE

DNCB caused epidermal hyperplasia and inflammatory cell infiltration typical of AD skin (Fig. 2B). Following application of ADFE to the aAD( +)/ADFE group, epidermal thickness (26.1 ± 7.0 μm; Fig. 2D) was less than that in the aAD( +) group (63.8 ± 2.8 μm; Fig. 2B). Meanwhile, the cAD( +)/ADFE group demonstrated epidermal hyperplasia and inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 2F), and the cAD( +)/EtOH vehicle group showed inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 2E). There was no significant difference in epidermal thickness between the cAD( +)/ADFE (44.8 ± 33.1 μm) and cAD( +)/EtOH (42.3 ± 8.5 μm) groups.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative histopathological images of skin from mice treated ADFE or vehicle. Two mouse skin samples per group were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (scale bar = 50 μm, 100X magnification). The aAD(-) and aAD(-)/ADFE showed no evidence of acute atopic dermatitis induction, regardless of ADFE treatment. The aAD( +) and aAD( +)/ADFE groups showed induction of acute atopic dermatitis regardless of ADFE treatment. The cAD( +)/EtOH and cAD( +)/ADFE groups were exposed to 10% ethanol or ADFE. The yellow letters E and D in left panel of (A) denote the epidermal and dermal layer, respectively. ADFE, Artemisia dubia folium extract; aAD(-), no acute atopic dermatitis induction; aAD( +), aAD induction; aAD(-)/ADFE, no aAD induction but ADFE treatment; aAD( +)/ADFE, aAD induction with ADFE treatment; cAD( +)/EtOH, chronic AD induction with 10% EtOH application; cAD( +)/ADFE, cAD induction with ADFE treatment

Full size image

Cardiac blood collected at the time of sacrifice showed no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to major hematologic parameters (Table 1). The aAD( +)/ADFE group had higher percentages of neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils, but lower percentages of lymphocytes and eosinophils, than the aAD( +)/EtOH vehicle group, which were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the percentage of eosinophils, monocytes, and basophils in the cAD( +)/ADFE group was lower than that in the cAD( +)/EtOH vehicle group.

Table 1 Hematologic parameters in mice with acute or chronic atopic dermatitis treated (or not) with ADFE
Full size table

Observation of biphasic immune alteration in the present model for induction of aAD or cAD

IL-4 induces isotype switching to IgG1 and IgE, whereas IFN-γ induces a switch to IgG2a; these antibody profiles reflect the typical predominance of TH2 or TH1 responses, respectively, in mice [6, 29]. Accordingly, calculating the relative levels of IgG1 versus IgG2a in serum and of IL-4 versus IFN-γ in culture supernatants is used to assess the predominance of TH2 or TH1 responses, respectively, in individual mice. Serum level of IgE was significantly higher in aAD mice than in non-aAD mice on day 14 and its respective day 0 level (Fig. 3A). This trend was also observed for the cAD group. The IgG1/IgG2a ratio was significantly higher in the aAD group than in the aAD(-)/EtOH group at day 14 (Fig. 3B) and was even higher in the cAD group. Considering the significant upregulation of IgG1 level in the aAD group but no difference of IgG2a level at day 14 compared with those levels in the aAD(-) group at day 14, respectively, IgG1 level seems more influential on the upregulatory IgG1/IgG2a ratio in the aAD group (Fig. 3C). The IL-4/IFN-γ ratio was higher in the aAD group than in the aAD(-)/EtOH group, but lower in the cAD group than in the aAD( +)/EtOH group, at day 42 (Fig. 3D), although the differences were not significant. The continuous increase in IFN-γ production in the cAD group seems to contribute toward the lowered IL-4/IFN-γ ratio at day 42 (Fig. 3F). Similarly, the IgG1/IgG2a ratio was lower in the cAD group on day 42 than in the cAD group on day 14. These findings suggest skewing of the immune response toward TH2 at 2 wk post-induction of AD, but this seems to decline by 6 wk despite persistent challenge with DNCB.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Biphasic immune responses in the aAD and cAD induction models. Serum samples were obtained 1 day prior to (Day 0) the first DNCB sensitization and again at Day 14 following induction. For the cAD groups, an additional sample was collected at Day 42. The IgG1/IgG2a ratio was calculated by dividing serum level of IgG1 by that of IgG2a, and the IL-4/IFN-γ ratio was calculated by dividing the IL-4 level (pg/ml) by the IFN-γ level (pg/ml), followed by multiplication by 100. Single cell suspensions on spleen cells were prepared on Day 28 for the aAD groups and on Day 42 for the cAD groups, and stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb for 48 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * indicates significantly different from the aAD(-)/EtOH group at Day 14 and its respective Day 0 level. ** indicates significantly different from its respective Day 0 level. *** indicates significantly different from the aAD(-)/EtOH at Day 14 level. # indicates significantly different from the aAD(-)/EtOH group. The abbreviations were described as in Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image

Effect of ADFE on splenic cytokine production

ADFE had different effects on the IL-4/IFN-γ ratio in aAD and cAD mice (Fig. 4A). A reduction on the ratio was observed after ADFE treatment of aAD mice, although the difference was not significant. However, a significant increase was observed in ADFE-treated cAD mice compared with the corresponding vehicle control group. Considering the significant upregulation of IL-4 level but no difference of IFN-γ level in the cAD/ADFE group compared with those levels in the corresponding vehicle group, respectively, IL-4 level seems more influential on the upregulatory IL-4/IFN-γ ratio in the cAD group (Fig. 4B & C). These findings suggest that ADFE has a dual function in that it suppresses TH2 immune responses in aAD mice and TH1-mediated immune responses in cAD mice.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of ADFE on splenic cytokine production. Single splenocyte suspensions were prepared and stimulated as described in Fig. 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * indicates significantly different from the cAD( +)/EtOH group. ** indicates significantly different from the aAD(-)/ADFE group, and *** indicates significantly different from the aAD( +)/ADFE group. # indicates significantly different from the aAD(-)/EtOH group. The abbreviations were described as in Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image

IL-17, an inflammatory cytokine produced by TH17 cells, plays a role in pathogenesis of aAD [4]. ADFE reduced IL-17 level in aAD mice; however, the level in cAD mice were higher than that in vehicle control mice (Fig. 4D). Level of another inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, was higher in aAD mice, and significantly higher in cAD mice, than in non-AD mice (Fig. 4E). However, ADFE had no significant effect on production of TNF-α when compared with the respective vehicle control groups.

Effect of ADFE on humoral immunity

Serum IgE levels in aAD(-)/EtOH and cAD( +)/EtOH mice were significantly higher on day 28 than in day 14, regardless of ADFE or vehicle treatment; however, this phenomenon was not observed in the aAD( +) group (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, ADFE did not modulate serum IgE levels since similar time-dependent changes in serum IgE levels were observed in both the aAD( +) and cAD( +) groups, regardless of ADFE or vehicle application. The effect of ADFE on the IgG1/IgG2a ratio was similar to that on the IL-4/IFN-γ ratio. In the cAD( +)/ADFE group, a significant increase in the IgG1/IgG2a ratio was noted on day 42 compared with days 14 and 28 (Fig. 5B), whereas the ratio in the aAD( +)/ADFE group was similar between the day 14 and day 28. Serum IgG1 level in the cAD( +)/ADFE group demonstrated the same alteration pattern as the IgG1/IgG2a ratio, whereas such observation was not apparent in the level of serum IgG2a (Fig. 5C & D). These findings could imply in terms of humoral immunity that ADFE has a potential to suppress TH1-mediated progression of AD at the later chronic stage through upregulation of TH2 reactivity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of ADFE on humoral immunity. Serum was obtained at Day 14 and Day 28 following the first DNCB sensitization. An additional collection on Day 42 was made for the cAD groups. The IgG1/IgG2a ratio was calculated as described in Fig. 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * indicates significantly different from its respective Day 14 level. ** indicates significantly different from the aAD(-)/EtOH or aAD(-)/ADFE group at each day, respectively. *** indicates significantly different from the cAD( +)/ADFE level at Day 28. The abbreviations were described as in Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate that Artemisia dubia improves AD symptoms by regulating the balance between TH2- and TH1-mediated immune responses during the acute and chronic phases. The paradigm of biphasic progression of AD has been addressed in human subjects [4, 7]. In the present study, the mouse model of AD induced by DNCB also demonstrated predominance of TH2-mediated responses during the acute phase of AD, resulting in upregulated serum IgE levels in mice, and an increased IL-4/IFN-γ ratio in murine spleen cell culture supernatants. The TH2 response was less prominent during the chronic phase of AD, despite persistent challenge with DNCB, which suggests an increase in TH1 activity. Although, ADFE reduced the IL-4/IFN-γ and IgG1/IgG2a ratios during the acute phase, both increased during the chronic phase (compared with the respective vehicle controls). Overall, the findings imply that ADFE concomitantly suppresses TH2 responses during aAD and TH1 responses during cAD.

The balance between different T cell subsets plays a major role in the pathogenesis of AD [25, 30, 31]. Early-onset AD is thought to be caused by skewing toward a TH2 response. Here, we found that ADFE blocked progression of early aAD by suppressing TH2-mediated responses, as indicated by a fall in the IL-4/IFN-γ ratio and the IgG1/IgG2a ratio. In addition, ADFE inhibited the augmentation of TH1 reactivity in cAD skin, as demonstrated by rebound of both ratios during the chronic phase. IL-17 plays a certain role in inflammatory response in AD [4]. Even though controversial results reported, IL-17 has been reported more often to be highly expressed in aAD stage but downregulated in cAD stage [32, 33]. This upregulatory expression of IL-17 in aAD stage expression is considered to alleviate the augmented TH2 reactivity in aAD phase. Application of ADFE at the early acute phase of AD led to a fall in IL-17 production and an increase in production during the persistent chronic phase, suggesting that ADFE could play a role for inflammatory responses during both phases.

IL-4, a representative TH2 cytokine, induces immunoglobulin isotype switching to IgG1, while the TH1 cytokine IFN-γ induces isotype switching to IgG2a [13, 28]. An increase in the IgG1/IgG2a ratio reflects the dominance of a TH2-mediated immune response observed in early acute AD, which was not observed following application of ADFE for 2 weeks. In addition, a reduced IgG1/IgG2a ratio reflects the dominance of TH1-mediated immune responses, typically observed in the persistent chronic group. ADFE application during the chronic AD phase led to a significant increase in the ratio by day 42, strongly suggesting that ADFE suppresses TH1 responses. Binding of IgE to antigen-specific FcεRI receptors on mast cells triggers degranulation of mast cells, whereas concurrent release of histamine causes itching, increased vascular permeability, and hypersensitivity [11, 34, 35]. We did not find that ADFE had a significant effect on serum IgE levels, suggesting that ADFE might not prevent IgE binding to mast cells. However, it may be postulated that ADFE may inhibit binding of histamine to its receptor, thereby controlling the histamine-mediated clinicopathologic effects. Histamine is a well-known mediator of cutaneous inflammatory response implicated with exacerbations of eczematous lesions [36, 37]. Therefore, the present pathologic results demonstrating amelioration of epidermal thickness and improvement of cutaneous condition in the aAD( +)/ADFE group could suggest the potential function of ADFE on the aAD. This possibility should be investigated to further elucidate the mechanism by which ADFE ameliorates AD.

TH2 cytokines play a key role in the differentiation, recruitment, and effector function of eosinophils, which are an important mediator of AD [38]. The present study demonstrated a tendency toward decreasing eosinophil numbers in the blood of mice with aAD and cAD after treatment with ADFE. Considering this result together with the immunoregulatory potency of ADFE on AD-related cytokines and immunoglobulin isotypes described above, ADFE appears to regulate the immune system on multiple levels to ameliorate AD. Macroscopic observation of skin sections from ADFE-treated mice with early aAD indicated a reduction in clinical symptoms of eczema and erythema, and concomitant slowing of progression of AD-like skin lesions, which was not observed in the persistent cAD group. These findings suggest that ADFE can provide symptomatic relief during the early phase of AD, although the finding that the skin is entirely xerotic and lichenified during cAD suggests that recovery might be limited [39]. Previous studies show that epidermal hyperplasia and increased inflammatory cell infiltration are major histological findings in those with AD [13, 28]. The marked decrease in epidermal thickness in AD-like skin lesions following treatment with ADFE for 2 weeks suggests that the compound mitigates hyperplasia during the acute phase.

Previous studies on Artemisia dubia focused on its anti-microorganismal or anti-cancerous properties in vitro [18, 20]. Phytochemical investigation of Artemisia dubia extract revealed the presence of bioactive constituents such as flavonoids, triterpenoids, phenolics, and steroids [19, 20]. These bioactive components might underpin the anti-inflammatory action of Artemisia dubia; indeed, flavonoids, phenolics, and steroids are anti-inflammatory [21, 40]. ADFE could contribute toward alleviation of atopic dermatitis progression through controlling inflammatory responses in AD. ADFE application may downregulate the immune pathogenesis implicated with TH2 predominance in acute AD phase, which could be supported by the present results with lowered ratios of IL-4/IFN-γ and IgG1/IgG2a in the acute phase. In addition, ADFE application could concomitantly reverse the immune-alteration related with TH1 predominance in chronic AD phase, in that those ratios were upregulated in cAD/ADFE group.

Conclusions

The present study revealed the efficacy of ADFE on immunomodulation implicated with induction and/or progression of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in mice. ADFE application on dorsal skin lesions mitigated the epidermal hyperplasia in the acute phase of AD, and eosinophilia was relieved in both acute and chronic phase. Further investigation seems necessary to delineate mechanisms involved with ADFE’s dual functions in controlling TH2 or TH1 reactivity in biphasic progression of AD. In addition, it is preferred to identify bioactive components in ADFE responsible for its immunomodulatory functions on alleviation of AD.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Dr. Yong Heo, upon reasonable request under permission of the DragonImmuno Inc. and the Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Daegu Catholic University.

Abbreviations

aAD:

Early phase acute atopic dermatitis

AD:

Atopic dermatitis

ADFE:

Artemisia dubia folium extract

ANOVA:

One-way analysis of variance

cAD:

Persistent chronic atopic dermatitis

DNCB:

2, 4-Dinitrochlorobenzene

ELISA:

Enzyme Linked Sorbent Assay

IFN-γ:

Interferon-gamma

IL-:

Interleukin-

TH1:

Type-1 helper T cell

TH2:

Type-2 helper T cell

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

References

  1. Egawa G, Weninger W. Pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: A short review. Cogent Biol. 2015;1(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allam JP, Novak N. The pathophysiology of atopic eczema. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006;31(1):89–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campana R, Dzoro S, Mittermann I, Fedenko E, Elisyutina O, Khaitov M, et al. Molecular aspects of allergens in atopic dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;17(4):269–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mu Z, Zhao Y, Liu X, Chang C, Zhang J. Molecular biology of atopic dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014;47(2):193–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang AX, Landén NX. New insights into T cells and their signature cytokines in atopic dermatitis. IUBMB Life. 2015;67(8):601–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoon HK, Shim YS, Kim PH, Park SR. The TLR7 agonist imiquimod selectively inhibits IL-4-induced IgE production by suppressing IgG1/IgE class switching and germline ε transcription through the induction of BCL6 expression in B cells. Cell Immunol. 2019;338:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsoi LC, Rodriguez E, Stölzl D, Wehkamp U, Sun J, Gerdes S, et al. Progression of acute-to-chronic atopic dermatitis is associated with quantitative rather than qualitative changes in cytokine responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(5):1406–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung DYM, Guttman-Yassky E. Deciphering the complexities of atopic dermatitis: Shifting paradigms in treatment approaches. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):769–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung DYM, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD, Nomura I, Hamid QA. New insights into atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(5):651–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu SH, Drucker AM, Lebwohl M, Silverberg JI. A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(4):733–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlapbach C, Simon D. Update on skin allergy. Allergy. 2014;69(12):1571–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain Z, Thu HE, Shuid AN, Kesharwani P, Khan S, Hussain F. Phytotherapeutic potential of natural herbal medicines for the treatment of mild-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A review of human clinical studies. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;93:596–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SH, Heo Y, Kim YC. Effect of German chamomile oil application on alleviating atopic dermatitis-like immune alterations in mice. J Vet Sci. 2010;11(1):35–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang JH, Do HJ, Lee E, Yim NH, Cho WK, Park KIl, et al. Jageum-Jung improves 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in mice and suppresses pro-inflammatory chemokine production by inhibiting TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced STAT-1 and NFκB signaling in HaCaT cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;221:48–55.

  15. Ashraf M, Hayat MQ, Jabeen S, Shaheen N, Khan MA, Yasmin G. Artemisia L. species recognized by the local community of northern areas of Pakistan as folk therapeutic plants. J Med Plants Res. 2010;4(2):112–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeb S, Ali A, Zaman W, Zeb S, Ali S, Ullab F, et al. Pharmacology, taxonomy and phytochemistry of the genus Artemisia specifically from Pakistan: a comprehensive review. Pharm Biomed Res. 2018;4(4):1–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nigam M, Atanassova M, Mishra AP, Pezzani R, Devkota HP, Plygun S, et al. Bioactive compounds and health benefits of Artemisia species. Nat Prod Commun. 2019;14(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X19850354.

  18. Lee HJ, Lee JY, Kim SM, Nho CW, Jung SH, Song DG, et al. Inhibitory effects of dicaffeoylquinic acids from Artemisia dubia on aldo-keto reductase family 1B10. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2010;53(6):826–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baykan Erel Ş, Reznicek G, Şenol SG, Karabay Yavaşoǧulu NÜ, Konyalioǧlu S, Zeybek AU. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of Artemisia L. species from western Anatolia. Turkish J Biol. 2012;36(1):75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kiani BH, Ullah N, Haq I, Mirza B. Transgenic Artemisia dubia WALL showed altered phytochemistry and pharmacology. Arab J Chem. 2019;12:2644–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. González R, Ballester I, López-Posadas R, Suárez MD, Zarzuelo A, Martínez-Augustin O, et al. Effects of flavonoids and other polyphenols on inflammation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2011;51(4):331–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Han HM, Kim SJ, Kim JS, Kim BH, Lee HW, Lee YT, et al. Ameliorative effects of Artemisia argyi folium extract on 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis-like lesions in BALB/c mice. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(4):3206–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang JH, Lee E, Lee BH, Cho WK, Ma JY, Park KI. Ethanolic extracts of artemisia apiacea hance improved atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in vivo and suppressed TNF-Alpha/IFN-gamma–induced proinflammatory chemokine production in vitro. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamad AF, Han JH, Rather IA. Mouse model of DNCB-induced atopic dermatitis. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2017;12(2):147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JY, Lee JH, Shin SJ, Cho AR, Heo Y. Molecular mechanism of atopic dermatitis induction following sensitization and challenge with 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene in mouse skin tissue. Toxicol Res. 2018;34(1):7–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim S, Kim Y, Kim H, Heo Y. A potential mechanism of 2, 4-dinitrochlorobenzene-mediated immune alterations resembling human atopic dermatitis in mice. Quant Bio-Science. 2011;30(2):85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  27. National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed. The National Academies Press; 2011.

  28. Jo GH, Kim SN, Kim MJ, Heo Y. Protective effect of Paeoniae radix alba root extract on immune alterations in mice with atopic dermatitis. J Toxicol Environ Heal-Part A. 2018;81(12):502–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abbas AK, Burstein HJ, Bogens SA. Determinants of helper T cell-dependent antibody production. Semin Immunol. 1993;5(6):441–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bieber T. Atopic Dermatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2010;22(2):125–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rerknimitr P, Otsuka A, Nakashima C, Kabashima K. The etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: barrier disruption, immunological derangement, and pruritus. Inflamm Regen. 2017;37:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sugaya M. The role of Th17-related cytokines in atopic dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Toda M, Leung DYM, Molet S, Boguniewicz M, Taha R, Christodoulopoulos P, et al. Polarized in vivo expression of IL-11 and IL-17 between acute and chronic skin lesions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(4):875–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Amin K. The role of mast cells in allergic inflammation. Respir Med. 2012;106(1):9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Thangam EB, Jemima EA, Singh H, Baig MS, Khan M, Mathias CB, et al. The role of histamine and histamine receptors in mast cell-mediated allergy and inflammation: the hunt for new therapeutic targets. Front Immunol. 2018;13(9):1873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ohtsu H, Seike M. Histamine and histamine receptors in allergic dermatitis. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;241:333–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohsawa Y, Hirasawa N. The role of histamine H1 and H4 receptors in atopic dermatitis: from basic research to clinical study. Allergol Int. 2014;63(4):533–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Simon D, Braathen LR, Simon HU. Eosinophils and atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2004;59(6):561–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Spergel JM, Paller AS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(6 Suppl):118–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tungmunnithum D, Thongboonyou A, Pholboon A, Yangsabai A. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds from medicinal plants for pharmaceutical and medical aspects: an overview. Medicines (Basel). 2018;5(3):93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the DragonImmuno Inc., Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Safety, Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan-Si, Gyeongbuk Province, 38430, Republic of Korea

    Manju Acharya, Ravi Gautam, SuJeong Yang, JiHun Jo, Anju Maharjan, DaEun Lee & Yong Heo

  2. Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Narayan Prasad Ghimire

  3. College of Pharmacy, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan-Si, Gyeongbuk Province, 38430, Republic of Korea

    ByeongSun Min

  4. Department of Toxicology, Graduate School, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan-Si, Gyeongbuk Province, 38430, Republic of Korea

    ChangYul Kim & Yong Heo

  5. Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea

    HyoungAh Kim

Authors
  1. Manju Acharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Gautam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. SuJeong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. JiHun Jo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anju Maharjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. DaEun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Narayan Prasad Ghimire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. ByeongSun Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. ChangYul Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. HyoungAh Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yong Heo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Acharya M, Gautam R, Kim HA, Heo Y; Data curation: Lee DE; Funding acquisition: Kim CY, Heo Y; Investigation: Acharya M, Gautam R, Yang SJ, Jo JH, Maharjan A; Methodology: Kim HA, Acharya M, Min BS; Project administration: Heo Y, Kim CY, Ghimire NP; Resources: Ghimire NP, Acharya M; Supervision: Kim HA, Heo Y; Writing—original draft: Acharya M, Heo Y; Writing—review & editing: Acharya M, Heo Y.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Heo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Macroscopic images of ADFE-treated mouse skin after induction of atopic dermatitis by application of DNCB. (A) Skin lesion in aAD mice following sensitization for 1 week, and challenge for 1 week with 1% or 0.2% DNCB. (B) Improved skin appearance in mice with aAD treated for 2 weeks ADFE. (C) Lichenified skin lesions in mice with cAD treated with 10% ethanol. (D) Lichenified skin in cAD mice treated with AVFE for 4 weeks (cAD was induced by DNCB challenge for 5 weeks). ADFE, Artemisia dubia folium extract; DNCB, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene; aAD, acute atopic dermatitis; cAD, chronic AD.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acharya, M., Gautam, R., Yang, S. et al. Evaluation of Artemisia dubia folium extract-mediated immune efficacy through developing a murine model for acute and chronic stages of atopic dermatitis. Lab Anim Res 40, 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-024-00201-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-024-00201-x

Keywords

Laboratory Animal Research

ISSN: 2233-7660